Hapoel Beer Sheva vs Vikingur Reykjavik: UEFA Champions League Predictions
Hapoel Beer Sheva host Vikingur Reykjavik at Toto Turner Stadium in the UEFA Champions League 2nd Qualifying Round, needing a result after losing the first leg 2–1 in Reykjavik. The Israelis are backed strongly by the market to win on the night, but the underlying prediction model clearly favours the Icelandic side to qualify and at least avoid defeat.
Form-wise, the contrast is sharp. Using the tournament recent-form block, Hapoel Beer Sheva’s record is a single match: one away defeat (form string “L”), with 1 goal scored and 2 conceded. Vikingur, by contrast, arrive unbeaten in three Champions League fixtures (“WDW”), with 2 wins and 1 draw, scoring 5 and conceding 3. That equates to 1.0 goals for and 2.0 against per game for Hapoel versus 1.7 for and 1.0 against per game for Vikingur in this competition run.
The predictions comparison indices underline this gap. On the form index, Vikingur lead 100 to 0, and in attack 83 to 17, reflecting that Hapoel have yet to score more than once in a match and have not won, while Vikingur have already produced multiple-goal performances. Defensively, Hapoel show a slightly better index (60 vs 40), consistent with them not being completely overrun in Reykjavik, but over three fixtures Vikingur’s defence has still allowed only 3 goals. The overall comparison total stands at 63.3 to 36.7 in Vikingur’s favour, a clear model tilt toward the visitors’ overall strength and current trajectory.
The head-to-head picture is small but relevant. There has been one competitive meeting: on 21 July 2026 at Víkingsvollur Stadium in Reykjavik, Vikingur were the home side and won 2–1 in regular time. They led 2–0 before Hapoel pulled one back, which matches the prediction model’s h2h index of 100 to 0. That first-leg win, combined with Vikingur’s unbeaten run (2 wins, 1 draw) in the competition, supports the idea that they are tactically and psychologically in a better place going into this second leg.
Top-scorer and top-assist data also favour Vikingur. Midfielders Daníel Hafsteinsson and Gylfi Þór Sigurðsson both feature near the top of the Champions League rankings, each with 1 goal and 1 assist in three appearances, plus strong all-round metrics (Hafsteinsson with an 8.9 rating, Sigurðsson 7.2). Hapoel have no such standout contributor in the current dataset, which suggests Vikingur’s creative and set-piece threat is more reliable at this stage.
The prediction engine gives Vikingur Reykjavik a 45% chance to win, with a 45% probability of a draw and only 10% for a Hapoel Beer Sheva victory. Crucially, the official advice is “Double chance: draw or Vikingur Reykjavik”, fully aligned with those probabilities and the comparative indices. That means the model expects the visitors to avoid defeat in the vast majority of scenarios.
The betting markets, however, price Hapoel as strong favourites on the night. Home odds range from 1.52 to 1.62 across major bookmakers, implying an approximate win probability of around 62–66%. Draw odds between 3.54 and 4.10 imply roughly 24–28%, while away prices from 4.40 up to 5.50 imply about 18–23%. In other words, the market is heavily shading towards a home win, while the prediction model sees Hapoel as the clear underdog.
This divergence creates a potential value angle. If you trust the model’s 10–45–45 split, then opposing Hapoel on the 1X2 line is logical. The safest alignment with the official advice is to back Vikingur Reykjavik on the double-chance market (X2), which should still be available at a reasonable price given the strong home bias in the odds. For more aggressive bettors, a smaller stake on Vikingur in the draw-no-bet or even outright away-win market can also be justified, as the model gives them as much chance of victory as of a draw.
Betting verdict: follow the official prediction and take Vikingur Reykjavik double chance (draw or away). The numbers suggest Hapoel are overvalued by the market, while Vikingur’s unbeaten form, first-leg win, and superior attacking metrics make them the smarter data-driven side to back not to lose.




