Celje's Tactical Mastery Secures 2-0 Victory Over Ararat-Armenia
Celje’s 2-0 win over Ararat-Armenia at Arena Z’dezele was a methodical, late-breaking victory built on territorial control, wing pressure, and a disciplined 4-3-3 structure. In a UEFA Champions League 3rd Qualifying Round tie that was level 0-0 at half-time, Vitor Campelos’ side trusted their positional play and volume of attacks, eventually converting sustained pressure into two decisive goals in the final 10 minutes.
Both teams shared possession at 50%-50%, but the quality and density of Celje’s attacks tilted the match. Celje produced 8 shots on goal to Ararat-Armenia’s 3 and generated 7 blocked shots, a clear indicator of how often they worked shooting positions around the box and forced the visiting back line to defend deep. The home side also earned 12 corner kicks to 9, underlining a territorial advantage and a game played largely in Ararat-Armenia’s half, especially after the interval.
Team Structures
Campelos’ 4-3-3 was built on a back four of P. Sirvys, Artemijus Tutyškinas, D. Hrka and Leonardo Koutris, with a midfield triangle of M. Kvesic, Mark Zabukovnik and S. Seslar supporting a fluid front line of M. Ivansek, A. Kucys and Milot Avdyli. The structure was designed less for direct transitions and more for wave attacks: full-backs stepping high, interiors occupying half-spaces, and wide forwards narrowing inside to overload central channels.
In contrast, Tulipa also set Ararat-Armenia up in a 4-3-3, but with a more conservative flavour. The back four of E. Grigoryan, A. Malis, B. R. Wilson Valdez and Hugo Oliveira sat relatively low, with H. Oliveira and K. Muradyan (from midfield) often dropping to form a compact block of five or six without the ball. The front three of Z. Banjaqui, Sandro Lima and A. Serobyan had to work long distances to connect counters, which contributed to Ararat-Armenia managing only 3 shots on goal and 1 shot off goal despite an equal share of the ball.
Disciplinary Patterns
The disciplinary pattern shaped the match’s rhythm. Ararat-Armenia picked up two early yellow cards at 19': Alwyn Tera for “Foul” and Hugo Oliveira for “Unsporting behaviour”. Those bookings constrained their ability to press aggressively in midfield and at full-back, encouraging a more passive block and giving Celje more time on the ball in advanced zones. Celje’s own bookings were more spread and came later: Koutris for “Foul” at 32', then Tutyškinas (64'), Avdyli (66') and Zabukovnik (79') also for “Foul”. These reflected Celje’s willingness to counter-press high and stop transitions at source. Benjamin Verbič’s yellow at 86' for “Unsporting behaviour” came after the breakthrough, a by-product of game management and heightened emotions rather than structural weakness.
Tactical Changes
The key tactical inflection point arrived with the half-time and early second-half substitutions. At 46', B. Verbic (IN) came on for L. Koutris (OUT), a bold move from Campelos that effectively traded a starting full-back for an attack-minded midfielder. This adjustment pushed Celje into an even more aggressive posture: Verbič operated high on the left, allowing the remaining defenders and midfielders to compress the pitch and sustain pressure. On 55', Benny (IN) came on for A. Tera (OUT) for Ararat-Armenia, refreshing midfield legs but not fundamentally altering their cautious 4-3-3 shape.
The decisive sequence began with Celje’s double change at 69': Y. Dukuly (IN) came on for P. Sirvys (OUT), and M. Poplatnik (IN) came on for A. Kucys (OUT). With Koutris already replaced and Sirvys now off, Celje effectively reconfigured into a far more attacking interpretation of their base shape. Dukuly’s introduction added direct running and ball-carrying from wide areas, while Poplatnik gave a more defined focal point in advanced zones. The back line had to adjust, but the reward was clear: more bodies between the lines and in the box.
Ararat-Armenia responded with a double substitution at 73', bringing on M. Carlier (IN) for H. Oliveira (OUT) and Franca Carlos (IN) for A. Serobyan (OUT), seeking fresh energy and some ball progression from midfield. However, the territorial trend did not shift. Celje continued to pin the visitors back, as evidenced by their 12 corners and 7 blocked shots—signs of relentless pressure and repeated efforts from the edge and inside the box.
Decisive Moments
The breakthrough at 83' was the logical outcome of that structural and personnel evolution. Y. Dukuly (Celje), introduced 14 minutes earlier, scored with an assist from Milot Avdyli to make it 1-0. The pattern behind the goal was emblematic: Dukuly attacking from a wide starting position into central space, Avdyli linking as an advanced midfielder/forward, and Ararat-Armenia’s back line unable to step out due to the volume of Celje runners. Two minutes later, at 85', B. Verbic (Celje) struck to make it 2-0, capitalising on his advanced role since half-time. The rapid double underscored how Campelos’ attacking substitutions had tilted the balance decisively.
Late changes—A. Ndour (IN) for Z. Banjaqui (OUT) at 89', I. Calusic (IN) for S. Seslar (OUT) at 90+1', and J. A. Balanta (IN) for K. Muradyan (OUT) at 90'—could not alter the tactical narrative. Ararat-Armenia, despite matching Celje in possession and earning 9 corners of their own, lacked the structural aggression and final-third presence to threaten consistently.
Statistical Overview
Statistically, the match paints a clear picture of Celje’s superiority in chance creation and territorial dominance. Their 8 shots on goal versus Ararat-Armenia’s 3, combined with 7 blocked shots, reveal a side that repeatedly forced defensive interventions close to goal. The 12-9 corner count reinforces the impression of Celje encamping in the attacking third, particularly after the interval and especially once Dukuly, Poplatnik and Verbič were all on the pitch.
Both teams committed a similar number of fouls—16 for Celje and 13 for Ararat-Armenia—but the distribution of yellow cards (5 for Celje, 3 for Ararat-Armenia) shows Celje were more willing to take tactical infringements in midfield and in counter-pressing situations. With no red cards and no penalties, the contest was decided purely by open-play structures and in-game adjustments.
Without explicit data on saves, passes or xG, the available metrics still support a firm conclusion: Celje’s 4-3-3, aggressively reshaped by Campelos through substitutions, transformed shared possession into superior shot volume and territory. Ararat-Armenia’s mirrored 4-3-3 remained too conservative, and once the home side found their breakthrough on 83', the tactical balance of the tie was fully reflected in the 2-0 final score.




